The student’s review exhibits many inconsistencies with correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation. The review is not documented nor follows a consistent format.

The student’s review exhibits some inconsistencies with correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation. The review is documented but does not utilize the proper Turabian format.

The student’s review exhibits correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation.  It presents clear and articulate ideas and is documented utilizing proper Turabian format.

Accuracy

The student’s review is inadequate, suggesting little effort. The review is done at the last minute or is late.

The student’s review is adequate but does not demonstrate excellence. It is minimal in content, indicating a moderate level of effort. The review is on time.

Student’s review is submitted on time or early, is accurate with regard to the assignment instructions, demonstrates a pursuit of excellence, and is thorough in content.

The student’s review is incomplete, indicating the material has not been read thoroughly. It provides no insight into the author’s thought processes or engagement with the material.

The student’s review suggests an individual perspective, but it is not unique and indicates only minimal engagement with the material and the author’s thought processes.

The student’s review suggests an individual perspective that is unique, indicating significant engagement with the material and the author’s thought processes.

The student’s review lacks scholarly engagement with the reading material and is lacking in addressing the relevant issues and personal application.

The student’s review demonstrates some scholarly engagement with the reading material minimally or only in part.

The student’s review demonstrates significant scholarly engagement with the reading material and addresses the relevant issues fully and completely.